DSpace Repository

Tree ring-based estimation of landslide areal reactivation as a fundament of magnitude–frequency assessment

Show simple item record

dc.rights.license CC BY eng
dc.contributor.author Šilhán, Karel cze
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-05T08:43:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-05T08:43:00Z
dc.date.issued 2020 eng
dc.identifier.issn 1999-4907 eng
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/985
dc.description.abstract Magnitude–frequency (M–F) relationships represent important information on slope deformation and are used in hazard assessment or as supporting data for urban planning. Various approaches have been used to extract such relationships in the past, but most of these methods drove at the problem of exact events´ frequency determination. Dendrogeomorphic (tree ring-based) approaches are actually thought to be the most precise method of dating past mass movement events that occurred within the last several centuries. Together with information on the spatial positions of the analysed trees, they represent a potentially very valuable tool for reconstructing M–F relationships, although their use for this purpose has been very rare in the past. In this study, M–F relationships are reconstructed using dendrogeomorphic methods for three landslides of different types (a translational slide, a flow-like slide, and a rotational slide) occurring in different geological materials (thick-bedded flysch, limestone marls, and volcanic breccia). In total, 572 disturbed trees were analysed, and chronologies of mass movement events were built. Landslide magnitudes were expressed in three ways: (i) the value of the standard It index; (ii) the area, as determined using homogenous morphological units; and (iii) the area, as determined using tree buffers. The power-law nature of M–F relationships was confirmed for all the landslides that were studied and using all the approaches that were applied. All of the combinations of results yielded high correlation values; nevertheless, differences were noted. The advantages and limitations of each approach used to reconstruct M–F relationships are also discussed. eng
dc.format p. 1-15 eng
dc.language.iso eng eng
dc.publisher MDPI-Molecular diversity preservation international eng
dc.relation.ispartof Forests, volume 11, issue: 4 eng
dc.subject landslide eng
dc.subject reactivation area eng
dc.subject dendrogeomorphology eng
dc.subject frequency eng
dc.subject sesuv cze
dc.subject plocha reaktivace cze
dc.subject dendrogeomorfologie cze
dc.subject frekvence cze
dc.title Tree ring-based estimation of landslide areal reactivation as a fundament of magnitude–frequency assessment eng
dc.title.alternative Letokruhový odhad plochy sesuvné reaktivace jako základ pro zhodnocení vztahu magnituda-frekvence cze
dc.type article eng
dc.identifier.obd 43876315 eng
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/f11040400 eng
dc.description.abstract-translated Magnitude–frequency (M–F) relationships represent important information on slope deformation and are used in hazard assessment or as supporting data for urban planning. Various approaches have been used to extract such relationships in the past, but most of these methods drove at the problem of exact events´ frequency determination. Dendrogeomorphic (tree ring-based) approaches are actually thought to be the most precise method of dating past mass movement events that occurred within the last several centuries. Together with information on the spatial positions of the analysed trees, they represent a potentially very valuable tool for reconstructing M–F relationships, although their use for this purpose has been very rare in the past. In this study, M–F relationships are reconstructed using dendrogeomorphic methods for three landslides of different types (a translational slide, a flow-like slide, and a rotational slide) occurring in different geological materials (thick-bedded flysch, limestone marls, and volcanic breccia). In total, 572 disturbed trees were analysed, and chronologies of mass movement events were built. Landslide magnitudes were expressed in three ways: (i) the value of the standard It index; (ii) the area, as determined using homogenous morphological units; and (iii) the area, as determined using tree buffers. The power-law nature of M–F relationships was confirmed for all the landslides that were studied and using all the approaches that were applied. All of the combinations of results yielded high correlation values; nevertheless, differences were noted. The advantages and limitations of each approach used to reconstruct M–F relationships are also discussed. cze
dc.publicationstatus postprint eng
dc.peerreviewed yes eng
dc.source.url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/400/htm cze
dc.relation.publisherversion https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/400/htm eng
dc.rights.access Open Access eng


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account