Репозиторий Dspace

Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review

Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.rights.license CC BY eng
dc.contributor.author Marešová, Petra cze
dc.contributor.author Štemberková, Růžena cze
dc.contributor.author Fadeyi, Oluwaseun cze
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-05T12:51:57Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-05T12:51:57Z
dc.date.issued 2019 eng
dc.identifier.issn 2076-3387 eng
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/317
dc.description.abstract Universities play pivotal roles when research findings are to be adopted commercially. Although these roles vary from one country to another, effective patenting and licensing procedures, as well as eventual commercialisation of scholarly inventions, reflect hard work on the part of the University mediating between the researcher and the industry through technology transfer offices (TTOs) in order to ensure that knowledge-developers take motivational and monetary credit for their findings. This paper details some existing models, processes, and roles taken up in some countries where sharing of intellectual property exists, and links it up with aspects of university-industry technology transfer, such as policies surrounding patenting, government investment and marketing, and the process of academic entrepreneurship, among others. 22 articles were found via a systematic review of literature and analysed with respect to four identified areas of focus: internal strategy, investment and market, academic entrepreneurship and policy. Based on models, processes, and roles in reviewed studies, our results indicate that new models for technology transfer mainly stem from the fact that there is no universally accepted model in the literature. Furthermore, management of technology transfer is mostly the responsibility of TTOs in most countries. While university TTOs act as intermediaries to protect the interest of the author/inventor, issues such as poor relationships between universities and industry, as well as funding, remain major challenges in many emerging economies. In contrast, researchers in western economies are mainly challenged by financial motivation and recognition within the academic domains. eng
dc.format p. "Article Number: 67" eng
dc.language.iso eng eng
dc.publisher MDPI eng
dc.relation.ispartof ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, volume 9, issue: 3 eng
dc.subject technology transfer models eng
dc.subject universities eng
dc.subject systematic review eng
dc.subject management eng
dc.subject commercialisation eng
dc.subject technology transfer models cze
dc.subject universities cze
dc.subject systematic review cze
dc.subject management cze
dc.subject commercialisation cze
dc.title Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review eng
dc.title.alternative Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review cze
dc.type article eng
dc.identifier.obd 43875544 eng
dc.identifier.wos 000487987200005 eng
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/admsci9030067 eng
dc.description.abstract-translated Universities play pivotal roles when research findings are to be adopted commercially. Although these roles vary from one country to another, effective patenting and licensing procedures, as well as eventual commercialisation of scholarly inventions, reflect hard work on the part of the University mediating between the researcher and the industry through technology transfer offices (TTOs) in order to ensure that knowledge-developers take motivational and monetary credit for their findings. This paper details some existing models, processes, and roles taken up in some countries where sharing of intellectual property exists, and links it up with aspects of university-industry technology transfer, such as policies surrounding patenting, government investment and marketing, and the process of academic entrepreneurship, among others. 22 articles were found via a systematic review of literature and analysed with respect to four identified areas of focus: internal strategy, investment and market, academic entrepreneurship and policy. Based on models, processes, and roles in reviewed studies, our results indicate that new models for technology transfer mainly stem from the fact that there is no universally accepted model in the literature. Furthermore, management of technology transfer is mostly the responsibility of TTOs in most countries. While university TTOs act as intermediaries to protect the interest of the author/inventor, issues such as poor relationships between universities and industry, as well as funding, remain major challenges in many emerging economies. In contrast, researchers in western economies are mainly challenged by financial motivation and recognition within the academic domains. cze
dc.publicationstatus postprint eng
dc.peerreviewed yes eng
dc.source.url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/67 cze
dc.relation.publisherversion https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/67 eng
dc.rights.access Open Access eng


Файлы в этом документе

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию

Поиск в DSpace


Просмотр

Моя учетная запись