DSpace Repository

Clustering-based EV suitability analysis for grid support services

Show simple item record

dc.rights.license CC BY eng
dc.contributor.author Hussain, Akhtar cze
dc.contributor.author Kazemi, Nazli cze
dc.contributor.author Musílek, Petr cze
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-05T16:10:39Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-05T16:10:39Z
dc.date.issued 2025 eng
dc.identifier.issn 0360-5442 eng
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/2465
dc.description.abstract The literature extensively discusses the benefits of electric vehicles (EVs) for grid support services. However, not all EVs are suitable for these services due to variations in service requirements (duration and frequency) and EV driver behavior (available energy, parking duration, and battery degradation). This study proposes a three- step EV classification approach to assist aggregators in selecting appropriate EVs for specific services. First, using data from the National Household Travel Survey and a commercial EV database, various EV parameters are estimated, including available energy for grid support services, the duration of parking at home and at work, and the battery degradation factor. Second, the K-means clustering method is applied to categorize EVs based on each parameter, chosen for its superior performance and lower complexity compared to other clustering methods. Finally, suitability indices are proposed for each service, taking into account the service requirements and EV parameters of different clusters. Each EV is then ranked to help the aggregators select the best-suited EVs for each service. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated for two ancillary services (frequency regulation and ramping) and two operating reserve services (contingency spinning and supplemental reserves). Simulation results demonstrate that more EVs are suitable for home services due to longer parking hours, while those with low parking duration are unsuitable for workplace services, despite low degradation scores. Additionally, the proposed method consistently shows higher poolable energy compared to the random selection method, with differences reaching 56 kW (10.1%) for 10 EVs, 383 kW (26.8%) for 25 EVs, and 895 kW (31.2%) for 50 EVs. eng
dc.format p. "Article Number: 134970" eng
dc.language.iso eng eng
dc.publisher Elsevier eng
dc.relation.ispartof Energy, volume 320, issue: April eng
dc.subject Ancillary services eng
dc.subject Clustering eng
dc.subject Electric vehicles eng
dc.subject Grid-to-vehicle eng
dc.subject Operating reserves eng
dc.subject Vehicle-to-grid eng
dc.title Clustering-based EV suitability analysis for grid support services eng
dc.type article eng
dc.identifier.obd 43882264 eng
dc.identifier.wos 001439479700001 eng
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134970 eng
dc.publicationstatus postprint eng
dc.peerreviewed yes eng
dc.source.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225006127?via%3Dihub cze
dc.relation.publisherversion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225006127?via%3Dihub eng
dc.rights.access Open Access eng


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account