A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews

Garssen, Bart; Svačinová, Iva

Accueil de DSpace
→
Univerzita Hradec Králové
→
Publikační činnost akademických pracovníků UHK
→
Voir le document

dc.rights.license	CC BY	eng
dc.contributor.author	Garssen, Bart	cze
dc.contributor.author	Svačinová, Iva	cze
dc.date.accessioned	2025-12-05T15:25:01Z
dc.date.available	2025-12-05T15:25:01Z
dc.date.issued	2024	eng
dc.identifier.issn	2211-4742	eng
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/2291
dc.description.abstract	The present study aims at clarifying how in literary reviews value judgements about novels are justified. For this purpose we first give an overall description of the place of literary reviews in journalism. Then, we characterize literary reviews as an argumentative activity type. Next, we turn to the argumentative pattern prototypical of literary reviews. To illustrate our account of literary reviews, we present an exemplary analysis of a particular review. In so doing we propose a tool for the empirical study of literary reviews.	eng
dc.format	p. 373-399	eng
dc.language.iso	eng	eng
dc.publisher	J. Benjamins	eng
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Argumentation in Context, volume 13, issue: 3	eng
dc.subject	argument from criteria	eng
dc.subject	activity type	eng
dc.subject	argumentative pattern	eng
dc.subject	literary reviews	eng
dc.subject	value judgement	eng
dc.title	A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews	eng
dc.type	article	eng
dc.identifier.obd	43881727	eng
dc.identifier.doi	10.1075/jaic.24005.gar	eng
dc.publicationstatus	postprint	eng
dc.peerreviewed	yes	eng
dc.source.url	https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar	cze
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar	eng
dc.rights.access	Open Access	eng