<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">

The role of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of its safety, adequacy, and accuracy with meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

dc.contributor.authorNdukwe, Munachiso Iheme
dc.contributor.authorPavone, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorHabes, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorBizzarri, Nicolo
dc.contributor.authorStepan, Martin
dc.contributor.authorBretova, Petra
dc.contributor.authorMascilini, Floriana
dc.contributor.authorKarasek, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorPohankova, Denisa
dc.contributor.authorUbom, Akaninyene
dc.contributor.authorHavigerová, Jana Marie
dc.contributor.authorHaviger, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorSirak, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-05T16:07:57Z
dc.date.available2025-12-05T16:07:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjectivesTo analyze the safety, adequacy and accuracy of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted through June 2024. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included in the review. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting complete 2 x 2 diagnostic data.ResultsA total of 2,250 articles were initially screened, and after the removal of duplicates, 54 articles were deemed eligible for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 18 studies, comprising 1,867 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy, were included in the systematic review. A total of 16 complications were reported across 1,898 biopsies performed in the included studies, resulting in a mean complication rate of 0.58% (95% CI: 0.187- 0.964%). Adequacy for histological and immunohistochemical examination after one attempt was reported in 16 studies, with a mean adequacy rate of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.69- 97.50%) and a median rate of 95.97%. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in 13 studies, revealing a mean diagnostic accuracy of 95.54% (95% CI: 93.19- 97.89%) and a median of 97.48%.In the meta-analysis of 10 studies, pooled sensitivity was 98.6%, specificity 41.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 47.2%, with high heterogeneity observed in specificity and NPV estimates.ConclusionsUltrasound guided tru-cut biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method, demonstrating a high adequacy rate for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. It shows excellent performance in confirming malignancy and supports preoperative decision making. To further define its role in the diagnostic pathway for ovarian cancer, additional prospective multicenter studies are needed-both to validate its reliability in negative cases and to ensure tissue adequacy for advanced molecular testing in the context of personalized medicine.eng
dc.formatp. &quot;Article number: 166&quot;
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7
dc.identifier.issn1757-2215
dc.identifier.obd43882181
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/2446
dc.identifier.wos001538764800003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publicationstatuspostprint
dc.publisherBMC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, volume 18, issue: 1eng
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://ovarianresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.source.urlhttps://ovarianresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7
dc.subjectOvarian cancereng
dc.subjectUltrasoundeng
dc.subjectTru-cut biopsyeng
dc.subjectCore needle biopsyeng
dc.subjectSystematic revieweng
dc.titleThe role of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of its safety, adequacy, and accuracy with meta-analysis of diagnostic performanceeng
dc.typearticle

Soubory

Původní svazek

Nyní se zobrazuje 1 - 1 z 1
Načítá se...
Náhled
Název:
s13048-025-01739-7.pdf
Velikost:
1,93 MB
Formát:
Adobe Portable Document Format