A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews

dc.contributor.author	Garssen, Bart
dc.contributor.author	Svačinová, Iva
dc.date.accessioned	2025-12-05T15:25:01Z
dc.date.available	2025-12-05T15:25:01Z
dc.date.issued	2024
dc.description.abstract	The present study aims at clarifying how in literary reviews value judgements about novels are justified. For this purpose we first give an overall description of the place of literary reviews in journalism. Then, we characterize literary reviews as an argumentative activity type. Next, we turn to the argumentative pattern prototypical of literary reviews. To illustrate our account of literary reviews, we present an exemplary analysis of a particular review. In so doing we propose a tool for the empirical study of literary reviews.	eng
dc.format	p. 373-399
dc.identifier.doi	10.1075/jaic.24005.gar
dc.identifier.issn	2211-4742
dc.identifier.obd	43881727
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/2291
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.peerreviewed	yes
dc.publicationstatus	postprint
dc.publisher	J. Benjamins
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Argumentation in Context, volume 13, issue: 3	eng
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar
dc.rights.access	Open Access
dc.rights.license	CC BY
dc.source.url	https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar
dc.subject	argument from criteria	eng
dc.subject	activity type	eng
dc.subject	argumentative pattern	eng
dc.subject	literary reviews	eng
dc.subject	value judgement	eng
dc.title	A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews	eng
dc.type	article

Soubory

Nyní se zobrazuje 1 - 1 z 1